Measuring Changes in Teenage Driver Crash Characteristics During the Early Months of Driving

In-depth examination of how rates of involvement in specific types of crashes change over time as new drivers gain experience, to improve our understanding of how driver education and graduated driver licensing systems could better prepare new drivers to drive independently.

September 2011

Suggested Citation

For media inquiries, contact:

Tamra Johnson
202-942-2079
TRJohnson@national.aaa.com

Authors

Carol Martell

Arthur H. Goodwin

Natalie P. O’Brien

The Situation:

  • Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for teenagers in the United States.
  • Over 730,000 young drivers ages 15 – 18 were involved in police‐reported crashes in 2009. In these crashes:
    • an estimated 280,000 people were injured o 2,805 people were killed
  • All 50 states and the District of Columbia have implemented some form of a graduated driver licensing (GDL) system for young drivers.
  • There has been little research on teens’ behavior as they transition from supervised to unsupervised driving or of the characteristics of crashes during this period.

Recent Teen Driving Studies:

Measuring Changes in Teenage Driver Crash Characteristics During the Early Months of Driving

  • Examined crashes during the first three years of licensed driving for North Carolina teens originally licensed at age 16 or 17.
  • Analyzed rates of specific types of crashes in relation to the length of time that the driver had been licensed. This analysis identified types of crashes that both occurred frequently and appeared to be amenable to reduction through better instruction and practice prior to licensure.

Transition to Unsupervised Driving

  • In‐depth study of 38 families with novice teenage drivers in North Carolina.
  • Collected data using in‐vehicle cameras installed in vehicles for first six months of licensed driving.
  • Video was recorded when the camera was triggered by vehicle movements (e.g., acceleration, braking, swerving) that exceeded threshold levels; a total of nearly 6,000 video clips were analyzed.
  • Researchers examined the external driving environment (traffic, weather, light, etc.) and the in vehicle driving environment (passengers, loud music, etc.) that led to “close calls” and other incidents that triggered the camera.

Key Findings:

Measuring Changes in Teen Crashes During Early Months of Independent Driving

  • Teen drivers are 50% more likely to crash in the first month of having a license than they are after a full year of experience. Drivers in their first month are nearly twice as likely to crash as they are after two years experience.
  • 57% of crashes in which a teen was partially responsible during the month involved three common mistakes – failure to reduce speed,
    inattention, and failure to yield.

Transition to Unsupervised Driving

  • In the early months of unsupervised driving, the majority of teens exhibit good driving habits however the study did find instances of texting behind the wheel, horseplay with passengers and running red lights.
  • While a very small number of instances of deliberate risk‐taking behavior were observed, the vast majority of “close calls” involved judgment errors that seemed to be indicative of inexperience and failure to anticipate changes in the traffic environment. A common scenario involved the teen braking hard after having initially failed to notice that traffic ahead was slowing or stopped.
  • Once teen drivers obtain their license to drive independently, the passenger make up shifts dramatically.
    • Parents and other adults were only present in 3% of the video recorded during licensed independent driving.This represents a dramatic shift after having an adult present all the time during the learners stage.
    • 65 percent of the time, teen drivers were without any passengers. However, when passengers were present at least one was a peer (61 percent), compared to sibling passengers (36 percent).

 

Suggested Citation

For media inquiries, contact:

Tamra Johnson
202-942-2079
TRJohnson@national.aaa.com

Authors

Carol Martell

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Highway Safety Research Center

Arthur H. Goodwin

UNC Highway Safety Research Center

Natalie P. O’Brien

UNC Highway Safety Research Center